Panama said:
VicViper said:
Panama said:
Toxicspikes said:
Panama said:
Pokemon Grey would have been less insulting than this announcement. At least then they'd have a reason for not making it a 3DS title. And don't try to sell me that smaller install base crap, MK7 and SML3D have incredible sales, using that argument would only make Gamefreak look greedy. |
This should basically be the same as what you call Pokemon Grey though.
|
Grey would be just one game, gamefreak are getting a tad greedy here.
|
One game, two games... what's the difference?
(almost) nobody buys both of them. The thing that matters is this is going to be a new game, and Grey would not. They would both cost the same.
How's that more greedy?
|
Pokemon Diamond/Pearl outsold platinum by around 10million units if VGchartz is of any indication sales wise. Marketing this as a black/white sequel is a far more lucrative sales model than Grey would have been. If this is a new experience full of new features I'll hold my tongue, but if I see even see one reused animated sprite and/or unchanged town then I'll be beyond disappointed and they'll be no better than the likes of Infinity Ward.
|
They should go for the less lucrative sales model?
And of course they'll use assets from the previous games, every sequel in existence does that. How's that evil?
And they'll become evil by making a new game? Why weren't they evil for you when they released Blue (jp), Yellow, Crystal, Emerald and Platinum... which are nothing more than expanded games.
I sincerely don't get your point. I honsestly thought this was going to be the end the trend of complains every 3rd version of the game gets when it's announced. BTW, Pokémon 3DS is going to come, the thing just turned 1 right now and will have one of the most busy years in history for games... Pokémon would be overdoing 2012!
