PullusPardus said:
Barozi said:
thekitchensink said:
See, this is DLC I can respect. They ship a highly complete, content-rich game, they wait awhile, and then they announce that, for a reasonable price, you get a large chunk of extra content.
By contrast, the Assassin's Creed: Battle of Forli DLC, which was quite clearly a level that was cut from the middle of the game, is exactly what pisses me off about this generation.
Bethesda, you have my respect. |
You know that the AC2 devs said that they ran out of time and therefore cut this and another episode to get the game finished and ready to ship during the holiday season.
Without DLC, you'd have never the ability to play these episodes AT ALL. BONUS CONTENT are the key words.
|
if that is true , then why charge for it? , also if that is true then why release an Ass Creed game every year?
|
Probably because:
A) the publishers aren't so generous to let their developers do whatever they want to if they don't see any money behind said project.
B) MS and Sony get money for every traffic caused by a game or DLC, so making it free would actually cost them something. (I think every DLC was 1GB each !)
and
C) Assassin's Creed 2 came out 2 years after Assassin's Creed. They didn't have such problems with Brotherhood and Revelations I think.
