RolStoppable said:
The PC cannot win a comparison between 360, PS3 and Wii. Besides, it's not about the sheer quantity of games, but the number of quality titles and how big they are that makes one platform the king. Also, there's a difference between rushing through a game and completing all of its levels. |
True, that's why NES (for example) can't win this either. I agree that the number of quality titles is the most important criteria, still the thread creator pointed out that this thread is about sheer quantity (thread title suggests the same).
What "king of ..." really means is unrelevant. He even admits that it can also mean in terms of sales, which he is explicitly excluding when creating this thread.
That was just a normal playthrough. Not rushing involved at all. Obviously did not pursue all bonus coins or secret places whatever. Mario games are not the only ones with optional goals. (If you looked at some XBLA achievements, you would come to the same conclusion)







