|
o_O.Q said: "It seems the rumble feature was supported, but that's it. It may also support analog controls but I'm not sure." i played spyro myself it supported both |
Good. I'll trust your testimony.
|
"A DualShock icon in the back of the game box meant the game support the dual shock features: vibration, analog controls. It could be one, but not the other. For example, some did not feature vibration but offered analog controls, the converse is also true." "Can you do some research please, I really don't like debating with you, you're very sloppy." research? you just posted the one of the most stupid misinformed things i've ever read in a post on this site with a link to forum posts as a "source", i'm starting to question if you're really being serious at this point or kidding around |
@italics. What do you expect me to do, we're discussing age-old stuff... I don't have a PS1 right now, I have a PS2. I don't have PS1 games to play on, and I could burn a bunch of them, but my PS2 isn't modded. What do you expect, really? An article? I didn't find any. If you're so interested, why don't you look it up a bit.
| research? |
Yes, research. Look things up online, get old PS magazines, load up a PS1 game. For God sakes, use your head.
|
"I want to know what not to argue on " lol what are you trying to say here? if you quote my posts and call me out on things i say ( or have never said ) doesn't the onus fall on you to make sure you understand what is being said and also that your posts are relevant to what was said? here i'll go back this is an example of what i'm reffering to in action
"
You most certainly did" post 1 : "uess i misinterpretated what you said there and besides there were several consoles that used analogs before either of them like the vectrex... but in terms of relevance going by sales the ps1 and ps2 sold more than any of nintendo's home consoles so far so i'd have to say that they played a bigger part in making analogs relevant ( if sales is what counts in making something relevant )" i didn't say anything here about improvement at all
post 2 :
"to your first part i'm not really sure what all the text is suppposed to prove i never argued about which was more ergonomic, had better design etc all i stated is that analog thumbsticks is not something that nintendo brought to gaming yes i would agree that they improved upon it and the controller in general but the same could be said of microsoft and sony, my main gripe is that i see many nintendo fans praising nintendo for their work with analog sticks when really for me they have only been implementing their own take on them like microsoft and sony after implementation by other gaming companies that aren't mentioned in this regard at all" i'll just assume you mean this part "yes i would agree that they improved upon it and the controller in general but the same could be said of microsoft and sony" where i actually said nintendo, microsoft and sony improved on analogs and controllers" |
Your posts are incomprehensible. If you formatted properly, provided links and boxed things (kind of like I do, you know), it would greatly help. In the mean time, I couldn't understand it. Orphaned quotes, no capitalization, orphan sentenses. I really can't read you anymore bud, you make me upset.
|
"Make yourself clear." excuse me but thats hilarious, you say i've said things i haven't said and expect me to make myself "clear" lol |
Yes, I said things you haven't said, because you're not clear. It's called causality. Try to understand with your limited intelligence.
