phinch1 said:
plus numbers don't mean jack countless times in history smaller groups have wiped out larger numbered enemies and finally, don't go bigging up Americas warefare tactics......because they arent that good, with all that tech you'd think there would be no such thing as Friendly fire |
Where to start?
1.They DID defeat taliban army... they overthrew their rule in afghanistan - they just didnt kill all of them, which is nearly impossible since taliban have reduced to guerrilla warfare tactics which can never be completely neutralized
2.Oversees troops don't represent 5% of true military power - every army is billion times more capable on its home soil. its the most comment knowledge. If you think america would even consider fighting on its home soil the same way they did in afghanistan or iraq, you need to check yourself
3.I never mentioned any numbers
4.Wow, you really don't have clue about these kinds of staff. Military technology has no relations to friendly fire at all. Friendly fire is caused by the mistake of a soldier, not his equipment