By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
lewisgerm said:


ill admit that you do have a point about third parties.. almost. while it would be great to hurt first parties, microsoft comes out with like.. no games, so there is not much i can do there. the main point is that i dont support developers making a game on a console that is here for no other reason than to make money off of and take advantage of other people's hard work.

seriously think about it though, microsoft has done nothing for this industry other than leech, they dont innovate or contribute anything to this industry. you may think what i do is wrong, but customers still have the option. if they say, 'no i want to buy this shitty game new,' i tell them ok, its going to be 64.24. so whatever.

as far as your complaints about nintendo, they do everything to make sure their customers are happy, and they do not screw us over. they dont lock out single player content, or make you pay extra fees to do anything. at least when NINTENDO makes a game, it is a complete experience. how messed up would it be if they took out a dungeon in skyward sword and then made you pay extra to play it. i would be so pissed off an my support for nintendo would drop in an instant.


Obviously MS contributed to the industry, online wouldn't be nearly what it is today without MS.  And then the First party games that they have like Halo and Fable which are loved by many.  

What MS and Sony first party games are you talking about that are missing single player content until you pay a fee?  Don't you have to pay extra to play Skyward Sword already because it requires an addon to play?  Why's that alright?



...