| RolStoppable said: Those are laughable concerns, at least with the examples you provided. |
This right here. There are mutliple games that use like 4 different control syles from just a single wiimote to the classic controler, which between the two have a huge number of button differences.
I have noticed that most of these games tend to be Nintendo developed. I think MH3 though has a few. So the only complaint or worry woudl be, how come so many developers can't seem to do such a simple thing that Nintendo always does. Seems every Nintendo game I have has like multiple control styles, while my non nintendo games only have one.
And I hate how so many of you say Nintendo defense force is out. Is it the defense force to point of clearly wrong things. If someone says 2 +2 = 5, am I a fanboy to say that its actually 4? Its like the gamespot review. I could care less about it being rated a 0, a 3, a 7.5 or a 10. What I do care about is things like saying the IR is bad, when it doesn't use IR. Saying the controls are bad when every other reviewer and consumer says they are amazing. Saying the formula is bland and outdated, when others are saying it is shook up. Ha also funny how they say its outdated, yet also say they wish it went back to the first Zelda's. How can you complain about something being outdated when you ask for it to be like something even older? Anyway, gamespot is what people its statistics call an outlier. Something that contradicts so badly from 99% of the rest of the data that it is completely ignored and thrown out. As I said, I don't care about the score, I care only about what is written in the review. His review is thrown out in my mind. Anything he had to say about the game is totally irrelivent.







