lestatdark said:
padib said:
lestatdark said:
padib said:
lestatdark said:
yo_john117 said:
lestatdark said:
yo_john117 said:
Looks absolutely phenomenal! Too bad the game is never going to come out >:/ |
That ain't even funny >___>
|
Seriously though how long have we been waiting? Damn Blizzard and their taking forever to make games.
|
3 years since it was announced at Blizzcon 2008. And so what, I can name a few console games that had us waiting for many more years. Blizzard is known to have very long development times, but they deliver always in the end. Plus, it's in their interest to release this game next year, to capitalize with both Heart of the Swarm and Diablo III. I just hope that their delusions of bringing DIII to consoles don't force them to delay this, that would be a major piss on pretty much every Diablo fan.
|
Please no! I would facepalm myself to death if that happened (unintenionally of course)
|
Same here. If they do want to release a console version, they'd better do as they did with Diablo for the PSX...though we all know how that turned out XD.
|
Ever tried Starcarft 64? :S
|
I did...it's on the same level of suckyness, without the need of buying a memory card solely for that game XD XD XD.
@TruckOSaurus - I can't fanthom that either, but it seems there has been a demand for a console version, even here on VGC by some members (i.e - those that don't know that PC gaming exists or think that you need to spend a bajillion dollars on one).
|
I just built an ancient dual-core with an Athlon 64 processor, 2GB RAM (soon to be 3) and a Radeon HD5450 entry level card and it plays StarCraft 2 just fine. And it was less than 200 dollars for everything. Granted, the monitor is an old CRT that I have laying around...but it can still play SC2 4v4 with relatively no lag, though it slows to 2FPS with 3 200/200 armies fighting each other.
