By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake said:
kain_kusanagi said:
All bulling are "hate crimes". I'm glad the mother is pressing charges and I hope the bully goes to juvi. But I can't stand the term "hate crime". Everyone who perpetrates violence is motivated by hate of some kind, so why do we segregate certain crimes as worse then others. If a bully beats up a nerd and gets a 3 day suspension it wouldn't make the news, but if the nerd was gay it is suddenly worse? That's what I don't understand. We should treat punish bullies harshly no matter who or why they beat them up. Their motive should only be used as evidence to convict them, not decide a sentence.

This is actually not true. There are several reasons why people can commit violent crimes. For example desperation (e.g. robbing someone because you need money), or even love (e.g. crimes of passion). And I'm not sure if you know anything about the legal system, but motive is mandatory when deciding how to sentence someone. This is the case with basically every crime. This is the difference between 1st degree and 2nd degree murder for example. And it's the best way to decide how dangerous a criminal is.

The prosecution uses motive to define the culpability of the defendant. The motive is a kind of evidence in convicting the defendant. Once you have a conviction the motive is irrelevant. Some crimes have minimum sentences. Take Murder 1 for example. The motive was used to convict, but the sentence is determined by the crime.

As for the reasons for violent crimes. I am very much aware there are many motives for committing violence. I was obviously talking about bullies not robbers.

My point was always that hate for a nerd or a gay or a minority are equal. Hate for someone who bumped your shoulder is just as irrational as gay bashing. I don't like the term "hate crime" becuase is segregates and we need less segregation and more equality in this world.