| oniyide said: been reading GI for years, so unless you can point me to a specific topic or editor im taken what you say with a bucket of salt |
http://www.gameinformer.com/games/monster_hunter_tri/b/wii/archive/2010/04/22/review.aspx
That is about the only thing I had to look up on GI to remember their biased against Nintendo (especially the Wii). They gave MH3 a 7.. WTF? The reviewer probably played it for a total of 10 hours if that. The game deserves at least a 8.5/10 considering it is one of the Wii best third party game.
I can keep going if you want me to. Lets see.. They gave BO on Wii a 6.5/10. I've played this game at least 300+ hours and it deserves at least a 7-8/10 rating. They also gave Goldeneye a 6.5/10 which it is at least a 7-8/10 game also. Looks like they knock a decent amount of points off just because the HD versions have a few extra things included and better graphics. Do the Wii game versions deserve an automatic 2-3 point reduction because they are produced on the Wii? Just looking at some of their Wii reviews on their site makes me laugh. They have games like Cars 2 at 7.75. So they are saying Cars2 is .75 better than MH3? I know these reviews are done by different people but come on. GI is a joke.
