By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Marks said:
Pavolink said:
Marks said:
Skyward Sword does look pretty bad, lets be honest. Forget for a moment the fact it has Zelda in the title and just look at the gameplay. Pretty weak.

Exactly. The games has very very weak gameplay. So, Ghirahim take Link's sword and attacks him? pfff, do you need to mix shield and sword attacks to defeat him at the first battle?

Let look at the bettle or the bird, you have to control like a plane as Wii Sports Resorts? The bow? or the Whip? Weak. Do you have to swing your sword on different directions because the foes are covering? Weeeaak

Seriously, no. Just no.


First off it looks terrible. It looks like its from about 2005, 360 launch games look better.

Secondly the entire combat is motion controls so that'll be hit or miss depending on the player and if he likes motion gaming or not. 

Just look at this dude http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1Z-P-RBzmw Like from around 2:00 on its some boss battle and she has to do is run around and then wave her arms around to swing the sword. Like yeah i guess its cool the way you swing your arms is how link uses his sword, but I don't want to play a game that's as long as Zelda with motion controls the entire time.

There's no way in hell this game will hold a candle to Ocarina of Time. Zelda is one game that should not have gone the way of motion controls. Plus its been in development about 5 years it took almost as long as GT5 to make and you get a game that's graphically not even as good as 360 launch titles?

Just forget its Zelda for a second and look at it objectively. 

THIS



Why don't you make like a tree and get out of here?