By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
marc said:
nintendo said:
No offense, but are you seriously implying that VGChartz (a free, fan based website) is a more reputable source then NPD (a very expensive compilation, used by every single publisher in the industry)? I'm just curious how the numbers could be so drastically off.

Uhm a free fan based website is usually not as corrupt as your highly valued expensive industry publisher. Have you ever read those expensive magazines and their game reviews? They are all paid off by companies. So to answer your question, I would be more inclined to believe the source making little to no profit especially in todays world.

A free fan-based website can also be much more biased than one with more of an image to keep intact. 

Sure NPD is probably biased as well(and being paid off for some titles they review), but think about their industry; if all of the games they review were perfect because the company was paid off, soon enough the magazine won't be considered any good and even getting paid off will not keep them in business.

A similar case could be said about VG, but they don't have as much on the line.

NPD has to keep their image good otherwise they will not see enough money and  fail.  They have to stay professional by being honest as much as possible.