Faxanadu said:
sapphi_snake said:
Faxanadu said:
sapphi_snake said:
Faxanadu said:
Rath said:
sapphi_snake said:
Rath said:
sapphi_snake said:
Aren't they supposed to test the blood anyways? Honestly, this seems like racial profiling, only even more stupid.
|
They do test the blood. If you read the OP you'd see that there is a period of time after catching HIV that it cannot be detected in the blood.
|
And taking blood from a straight person and saying 'oh, this person's straight and AIDS is a gay disease, so I'm sure we can use it with no worries' is such a good ideea. This is just another case of demeaning gay people.
|
AIDs is much much more prevalent amongst men who have sex with men in the developed world. That is simple fact. To not use that information simply because some people see it as discriminatory would risk infecting people with HIV.
|
Dont try to use reason, statistics and facts with people that moralise.
|
Homophobia is irrational, so you're one to talk. 
|
I am not homophobic.
I also approve that known drug addicts cannot donate blood due to the same reason. And I do not care if said drug addicts are homosexual or heterosexual.
I really dislike that you are putting your "homosexuals are always discriminated" above the risk of small children being put at greater risk to get HIV via blood infusions.
|
So being gay is the same as being a drug addict? And heterosexuals don't engage in promiscuous sex? You are aware that the current situation allows for promiscuous heterosexuals, and even heterosexual prostitutes to donate blood, no? All this while homosexuals who don't engage in promiscuous sex are banned, and all because they're gay.
|
Please try some reading comprehension and dont play stupid.
I am against any group of people with higher risk of HIV exposure donating blood.
gay men are such a group. Deal with it.
|
He cant, because that would mean he would have to acknowledge the fact that hetrosexuality and hetrosexuals have in some way, shape or form an natural advantage or benefit, or even improvment compared to homosexuals, and I guess that makes him very angry for some reason, despite that HIV being more common to gays is a long proven scientific, medical and biological fact. Let alone, that this is only to insure safety and well being of people who need blood to stay alive, gays are not to be ''discriminated'' just because thousands of people can get HIV and die painful and slow death
