By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Runa216 said:
SaviorX said:
Runa216 said:
Really? seriously?

You don't think Nintendo didn't know about Move far before we did? Even if they didn't, they're still playing catch up. they released a console that wasn't as good as they wanted it to be, so they waited two years to release an upgrade. I don't care what anyone says, that's still money-grubbing.

Besides, I wasn't making an article, I'm not doing research, nor was the timeline in any way effecting my point. You people just go out of your way to bitch and moan about everything you possibly can, don't you? That gets really, REALLY annoying. Oh, and I'm a reviewer, I don't write articles, so get YOUR facts straight before making accusations.


I agree with you, but I don't get the bolded part.......

Oh, that was about how they made the Wii using the technology at the time, then waited two years to release an attachment that was required to play some games.  I find that very distasteful and just another way they leech customers of all the money they can.  I, for one, will not support that behaviour.  if Skyward Sword was playable without WiiMotion+ or it came packaged with it, I'd be okay, but I won't pay for it.  

'They waited two years to release an attachment that was required to play some games.'

How is that any different to Microsoft and Sony launching Kinect and Move midway through the generation? They are both attachments that are required to play some games, and they waited until they saw the success of the Wii to release them. They're also both a hell of a lot more expensive than a Motion+ attachment...



VGChartz