Runa216 said:
Oh, that was about how they made the Wii using the technology at the time, then waited two years to release an attachment that was required to play some games. I find that very distasteful and just another way they leech customers of all the money they can. I, for one, will not support that behaviour. if Skyward Sword was playable without WiiMotion+ or it came packaged with it, I'd be okay, but I won't pay for it. |
'They waited two years to release an attachment that was required to play some games.'
How is that any different to Microsoft and Sony launching Kinect and Move midway through the generation? They are both attachments that are required to play some games, and they waited until they saw the success of the Wii to release them. They're also both a hell of a lot more expensive than a Motion+ attachment...

VGChartz







