| IseeLight said: MS has done a good job of promoting believable future innovation with Kinect but they have delievered none of it, you say MS had the right idea but the tech isn't there, did you forget that Sony beat MS to it and didn't go with an upgraded camera because they weren't advanced enough and weren't cost effificient for what they wanted? (1) The move works better and (2) is cheaper then Kinect, Sony made the right move, in the future they may go back to camera only when it's actually viable but (3) saying MS had the right idea and Sony didn't is so ill-informed. |
1) At what exactly? 3D tracking? Body tracking? Voice commands? The Move is more accurate with what it does, but Kinect does a lot more stuff.
2) Depends on what you want to achiece. A single Move controller and a camera is certainly cheaper, but start adding more Move controllers for multiplayer or certain games, not to mention the Navigation Controller.
3) How so? Microsoft has made lots of money from Kinect and it's been a huge success, while the Move is a moderate success at best. The technology in the Move might be more mature, but Kinect is much more innovative and has attracted a much larger audience, despite its limitations.
As for why a Move 2.0 is needed, why isn't it? The Move might be good at what it does, but why not make it do more?
