Is Microsoft the only one of the big 3 who knows how to run a video game business at this point?

[fauzman]

reviniente said:

NYANKS said:
MS is gonna force Sony to charge for online for everyone. It's unfortunate, but money's money I guess.

Yes, Yes! To NYANKS you listen!

I've been saying it for months: SON¥ is a business, not a charity. If every quarterly report shows your profit's going south, you're not taking care of your business. A free PSN is not a sound option if you're looking to make the PlayStation brand profitable and self-reliant. SON¥ (SCE) needs to become more efficient and productive. I mean, where the hell's SON¥ supposed to trim the fat? Price cut on an expensive console to manufacture, that for a very long time, it had to sell at a loss? On games currently selling at the same retail price as X360 games, in spite of the fact that they come in more expensive media (or give up on Blu-ray altogether)? Rid itself of profitable and competent first-party studios? No. Right now, the fat is PSN.

I think you are totally wrong here. There is NO evidenc e that sony will adopt a paying psn. The PSV from all reports will have free psn (or PSV equivalent) activity and having a pay psn system would limit crossplatform connectivity (as the psv and ps3 will have, and so may the ps4). Also sony will know that one major point of difference that may have added to the sales of ps3 would be that online is free. I dont see sony alienating all its fans who expect a free online system on a par with pc gaming by including a pay psn system. Finally, sony has attempted to garner greater profits with its own psn+ system which attempst to do what xbl has done for MS (though not as profitable). Point is It just doesnt make sense for sony to charge for their psn service - it will inevitably cost them but they have proven they are willing to take losses in areas to get better sales/profitability elsewhere.