NightDragon83 said:
Ahem.... according to the "official story" on the collapse of WTC 7(which is apparently completely made up along with all the other events "On September 11, 2001, 7 WTC was damaged by debris when the nearby North Tower of the WTC collapsed. The debris also ignited fires, which continued to burn throughout the afternoon on lower floors of the building. The building's internal fire suppression system lacked water pressure to fight the fires, and the building collapsed completely at 5:21:10 pm The collapse began when a critical column on the 13th floor buckled and triggered structural failure throughout, which was first visible from the exterior with the crumbling of the east mechanical penthouse at 5:20:33 pm." Again... THIS is why the building collapsed... But yours and ever other conspiracy theorists' explanation for that is "duhhhh, well a plane never hit the building, so it must have been a controlled demolition AH-DUUUUUHHHHHH!" If it was a controlled demolition... then why didn't any of the debris or fires set off ANY of the explosives in the building prematurely (ditto for buildings 1 and 2 when the planes hit and exploded... why didn't they set off the charges if they were demo jobs too?) And why, if it was a controlled demo, did that evil Jew Larry Silverstein and his cronies Bush and Cheney wait an entire 7 hours AFTER the twin towers had already been destroyed to demo that building too? Oh, by the way... I found Obama's original Kenyan Birth Certificate. I'll give it to you if you give me your SS number and the PIN to your debit card since you won't be needing either one of those after you become filthy rich by being able to prove to the world that the president is not a legal US citizen. |
The final conclusion of the NIST report (the official story) claims that the tower 7 didn't come down because of fuel oil burning, neither because of debris hitting the tower and neither because of weakened steel structure (Because fires were not hot enough to even weaken steel).
It claims that it was due to steel expansion which damaged the concrete floors and then a single column failing (which they even specify despite never seeing a single piece of steel from the wreckage because it was all quickly removed) caused a structural massive failure which led into a chain reaction and brought down the building. They claim all the columns failed at the same time, thus the falling building followed a path of NO RESISTANCE. Do you understand how stupid and unrealistic this sounds. Do you even understand basic physics?
Stop being a sheep, open your eyes and listen to what independent sources have to say before you single out everyone who is searching for the truth and is backing up those claims with cold hard facts. Your government lied to you, and so do most of the world governments.
I'm sure you aren't even an adult, so I won't deal with you much longer, since all I get are immature and stupid answers.
Proud poster of the 10000th reply at the Official Smash Bros Update Thread.
tag - "I wouldn't trust gamespot, even if it was a live comparison."
Bets with Conegamer:
Pandora's Tower will have an opening week of less than 37k in Japan. (Won!)
Pandora's Tower will sell less than 100k lifetime in Japan.
Stakes: 1 week of avatar control for each one.