What would you do if Nintendo bit the dust?

[o_O.Q]

RolStoppable said:

o_O.Q said:

RolStoppable said:

I took a quote directly from one of your posts and that post can be viewed by clicking on the link.

"the argument itself was off topic for this thread "what would you do if nintendo bit the dust"

i originaly said that the strategy taken by HD consoles was better in my opinion because it provided versatility and allows for more features... i only branched into saying that the wii wasn't original because the claim was made that it was "new""

how did i disagree with any of that?

 

By implying that you said something different. But anyway, now that you've confirmed your statement, you have basically admitted to being wrong.

Not that I believe that you won't try to say otherwise now, but at this point it doesn't matter anymore. The only person who could be convinced that you were not wrong is nobody other than yourself.

i'm confused 

"By implying that you said something different" i did? how? this was the post i originally made

"the strategy microsoft and sony used this gen from the standpoint of options provided was better than nintendos because they offered more versatility... in that for example microsoft and sony were able to offer add ons to suuport motion gaming but the wii will never be powerful enough to accomplish many of thefeatures provided by the HD twins..."

this was the post i made in reply to rainbird 

"i originaly said that the strategy taken by HD consoles was better in my opinion because it provided versatility and allows for more features... i only branched into saying that the wii wasn't original because the claim was made that it was "new""

i don't see how it can be said that i implied saying something different

"now that you've confirmed your statement,you have basically admitted to being wrong "

you mean the statment i never denied above? by the way how is the statement wrong? would you disagree that the HD consoles are more versatile and powerful than the wii?