pezus said:
Huh, if # of games =quality, wouldn't GT be seen as a quality franchise (since it has many iterations). I agree with you though that # of games does not equal quality, I only mentioned the number to try to explain why R&C was higher...more people have played it. |
But only 1 GT on the PS3. I see what you mean about R&C. Oh well, sucks for InFamous.
@Jay.... I don't know what to say to you. If I released 10 6 month development Bomberman games, and 1 amazing Zelda title. Does that mean the Bomberman franchise is better? (random games) Sometimes a franchise which see's lots of interations is better then a standalone game, but number of games is not part of the criteria for a quality franchise.
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database 
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results













