By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
a.l.e.x59 on 15 January 2008
Edit Thread
BenKenobi88 said:
What the heck are you talking about?

A) The first Mario Advance didn't have a subtitle, not a huge deal, it did say what game was inside right on the cover though. For future Mario Advances, they put the game's name right in the title to avoid confusion. As easy as that. They don't all appear the same, but rather, they improved on the original title formula. Improvement IS possible.

B) The Mario Advance games are GBA ports of the most popular Mario games. It's not about taking them in order or anything like that.

C) Super Mario Bros. 2 in the US is the Doki Doki Panic Mario game. It was on the NES, it always will be. We played it as a Mario game and we remember it as a Mario game, get over it.

D) You take this stuff too seriously.

What the heck are you talking about?

A: "The first Mario Advance didn't have a subtitle, not a huge deal, it did say what game was inside right on the cover though." Why would you state, what I have already stated, in my post?

"For future Mario Advances, they put the game's name right in the title to avoid confusion. As easy as that." Okay, but they should have planned out the titles of the series, ahead of time. They have created confusion, but making the later games in the series, have two parts to their titles, instead of one. The very first game, should have, officially, had two parts to its name, instead of one, and have only the box art, have, unofficially, the two parts of the name. So, no, it's not as easy as that, for they messed up the entire series of titles, in too many ways.

"They don't all appear the same, but rather, they improved on the original title formula. Improvement IS possible." They did not improve it, they imbalanced it. All titles should either have two parts to their titles, or better yet, one. It should not be mixed up like this. And, occasionally, the first part of the title, comes before the second part of the title, to create this unnecessary, randomness.

B: "The Mario Advance games are GBA ports of the most popular Mario games. It's not about taking them in order or anything like that." This is incorrect, for the original Super Mario Bros. game, and the real Super Mario Bros. 2, in Japan, did not make it into the series, but instead, deliberately missed it, to join the NES Classic Series. Because Super Mario Bros. 2, in North America, is not the real one, only two, true Mario games, made it into the series. Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island is also not a Mario game, but a Yoshi game. Never-the-less, it is not about taking them in order, yes, but series of titles, the order of the games, and the fact that some games are missing, is too unforgiving, and this thread focuses on that aspect, and not the games themselves.

C: "Super Mario Bros. 2 in the US is Doki Doki Panic Mario game. It was on the NES, it always will be. We played it as a Mario game and we remember it as a Mario game, get over it." Yes, I already mentioned, in the original post, that it is "Doki Doki Panic." Yes, it will always be on the NES... That is obvious... Yes, we remember it as a Mario game... That is also obvious... Get over what? The truth, about how it is a fake? I don't care, but that is the truth. It is not a real Mario game, therefore, it counts as another "mistake," for we could have had the real Super Mario Bros. 2, on the Gameboy Advance, as a Super Mario Advance game, and not an NES Classic Series game, in Japan. I mentioned it, just to add to the list of errors.

D: "You take this stuff too seriously." Well, that all depends on how you read, what I write. You can interpret it as serious, or not. I just decided to make a post, regarding the subject. I do not take it seriously. Just because, I accurately, pointed out all the errors, does not mean that I take it seriously, but it only means that I am accure... Is that also, not obvious?