| Euphoria14 said: They should have asked Epic how to have a games flaws get overlooked so it can recieve a super high score.
|
Just letting you know, the review system changed in 2008. The review was written in 06. Dan Hsu doesn't work for 1UP anymore (since they fired him and the rest of the EGM crew) and they did a bang up job translating Mr. Hsu's 9 out of 10 score to A+ when they switched to the new system.
1UP isn't even worth paying attention to anymore since they got bought out by UGO who fired all the good editors and then UGO themselves got bought by IGN.
I'm not trying to discredit your post, I'm just explaining.
@OP
The game is actually a lot of fun. I like it. Car controls could use work (just like in Half-Life 2/ep1/2) and it's not always super clear where you need to go but it certainly doesn't have ridiculous loading times like these reviewers are saying and terrible graphics and bad framerate.
I can't speak for consoles, but no one should be playing a Duke Nukem game on a console to begin with. I also never played Duke Nukem 3D so I don't have any bias? I guess against DNF. It's a fun game and worth the 44.99 USD I paid for it on Steam before it came out. Skip the console versions, most people could probably run this game on their PCs anyway. And I'm pretty sure it's 50 bucks on Steam, not 60.
