By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mchaza said:
Rainbird said:
bugrimmar said:

Get it devs, KINECT IS FOR KIDS, not for guys who want to shoot people!

Please, now you're just being ignorant. I'm not going to tell you what to think of Kinect, but if you don't think it can't improve gameplay outside of kids games, then you really are blind. Mass Effect 3 looked way more fun to play giving voice commands to your squad instead of going through all the menus, and it looks like it will drive immersion up too. Ryse looks akin to Red Steel 2, which was awesome. Fully tracked battles with sword and shield, yes please!

Nothing an head set cant do is all i am going to say there for mass effect 3. 

Anyways Kinect isn't an kids only toy, i dont reguard middle age mothers as kids. But i have pointed out many times, until 3D movement can use kinect (with no controller) its been an failure on the core gamer front and devs shouldn't bother. I also dont see using an controller then getting up or throwing an arm in the air going to create immersion if they do add an controller to the mix. 

The point of Kinect is to make the technology invisible, and making people wear headsets makes it much less accessible. In the case of ME3, yes, a headset could have done the same, but why not have a device that can do more? 

And we have 3D movement without a controller, you could see it in Ghost Recon. I don't know if it's a good implementation, but it's there. Star Wars Kinect allows you to move around as well without a controller (you can change directions and move forward in this direction).