Sqrl said:
Actually I did explain it quite well and it is you who have failed to read what is posted. I approached the discussion with demeanor of open debate you have approached with a rude and snide demeanor. Do want a discussion or a bitch fest? I will however indulged you and explain yet again. The comparison, as I said in my first post, is skewed because it doesn't account for reality as it stands NOW. It ignores the most recent year of 360 software sales which means that the data, while valid, is outdated. It may mean that its skewed for the 360 or against it but it does allow a skew to exist. I also pointed out that normally software sales will decline starting in the 3rd year and so this method will likely favor the 360. If you read my post I pointed this out not to invalidate the method you chose but to illustrate that all methods have inherit flaws and shortcomings. Such things must be accounted for before meaningful and valid conclusions are to be drawn and good anlaysts do so. Both methods are valid when used properly, the same way a gun can be a useful tool when used responsibly and a murder weapon used irresponsibly. |
So in other words you aren't going to compare the first year attach rates for all three consoles. That's all you had to say, end of discussion.







