Vgchartz ranking game -- Super Mario Galaxy 2!

[Conegamer]

non-gravity said:

RolStoppable said:

All that is, is grasping for straws. You can't think of much to criticize, but you don't want to give out a high score, so you try to justify it somehow. I remember when Super Mario Galaxy came out in 2007, there were people who complained about the lack of online play.

When even KylieDog can't come up with enough stuff to score the game less than an 8, you know that there's something fishy about the lower scores.

Does a game start at 10 and then gets lowered, or does it start at 5 and then gets raised? 

KylieDog could think of enough positive things to raise the score from 5 to 8.

 

But can people think of enough negative things to lower it from 10 to 5.4? 

Like I said, not a single critic review is below 90%. Undercutting that by over 30% because of 'no story' and 'no HD' is criminal. Take it for what it is. Don't compare it to HD games and you'll be fine. Otherwise all games released pre-this gen would score around 4 because of 'poor graphics!' or 'no online!' etc.