brendude13 said:
Conegamer said:
Ninpanda said:
Conegamer said:
Well yeah, I agree, but a score so low when all the other scores are so high obviously shows sabotage to me, or an anomolus result. Either way, it should be removed
I'd say this for any game BTW. Not just this one.
|
Or maybe, just maybe, he just doesn't like the game. It's not an irreproachable angel from the heavens, y'know. Though I will concede that he should elaborate a little.
And I didn't see you complaining when Doobie_Wop and Mirson gave Red Dead Redemption a 3 and a 2, when virtually everyone else was giving scores in the 8-9 range.
|
Hmm...
But my issue is having 1 score so far below the mean. If there were scores of 7 or 6 or something then fine. But it just seems trollish. I may be wrong, but it needs elaborating at the very least, right?
|
He didn't give any reasons for why the score was so low.
I believe the VGChartz ranking rules says that low scores need to be explained, it wasn't, therefore you are justified to remove his score, as long as you remove other trollish scores from the other games and re-calculate the averages.
|
Precisely! His argument was flimsier than paper. Story? Please, get some REAL reasons. And the fact he hasn't commented afterwards seals it for me.
Don't forget;
-Graphics were supposed to be amongst the best of the gen
-Gameplay apparantly TOO hard for some
-Bosses...alright, maybe. But that doesn't drag down a score that much 
