| Lord N said: 1. It wasn't poorly delivered. You're just the only one who didn't get it, which isn't surprising at this point. 2. The information has already been provided. Deal with it. 3. I said that it has already sold more than any handheld that wasn't made by Nintendo. This has already been proven, and you haven't given anything to refute it, end of story. The 360 isn't a handheld, but the If the PSP has sold 20 million in two years and is doing poorly, then the same should apply to the 360, which hasn't even sold half of that in 1.5 years. You want to compare home systems to home systems? Fine. The 360 must being doing extremely poorly because it's being outsold by the Wii and has yet to outsell the seven-year-old PS2. That's right, it can't even outsell the predecessor to its competition even after 1.5 years. The PSP, on the other hand, is outselling the wildly popular predecessor to the DS, the GBA. Damn that failing 360! 4. I said that handhelds skew towards a younger audience, and there have already been plenty of examples given to reflect this. Perhaps it's you who should read the posts you reply to. 5. Microsoft also said that 10 million 360's were going to be sold by the time the PS3 and Wii launched, but it still has yet to reach that even now. But none of that is relevant. I think Sony knows which demographic they were targeting with the PSP. No points here, really. Seriously, just give it up. If points are going over anyone's head, it's yours. The information you asked for was provided, your posts have been directly replied to and debunked, and yet you continue to post irrelevant arguments and inane rhetoric, and I'm not even going to bother reading anymore of it, much less replying to it.
|
1. Yet you fail to provide the slightest bit of evidence to support such.
2. That doesn't change the fact you attempted to attack my request originally, now you're trying to counter with your own volunatary supplementation of that information. Also, I proved that information doesn't prove the original point.
3. You are correct in my mistaken take on your words. But yes, the 360 could by and large be considered a failure due to is non existant sales in Japan and embarassingly slow sales. Also, Handhelds sell more than Consoles, so comparing the sales of a Console to a Handheld don't really show much in regards to either's success or failure. Comparing the two is convenient for you because you want to use it to support your theory that the PSP is a success, despite its infamous reputation in quality, poor game library and pathetic UMD format.
4. You were essentially claiming that the PSP was for adults and that the DS was for children, don't try and dodge the fact by generalizing the two. You were caught red handed there.
5. Sony was targeting the 360? Wonderful logic. Obviously the PSP wasn't competing with the DS, it was competing with the 360. Hey, if the PSP can't outsell the DS it can at least outsell the 360 right? lol. You'll take any little victory you can won't you?
I caught you in a sloppy argument, don't act like you debunked anything either than pointing out my misunderstanding of your words in regards to prior handhelds. Everything else in the arguments stands as is, you tried to childishly pair the PSP up against the 360 to dodge its defeat at the hands of the DS and then tried to make a pathetic jab at the DS by saying it did better because it was more kiddie. Perhaps you should ignore me and refocus your efforts on trying to convince yourself that your PSP is a sure thing.
