Obama calls for Israel to restore 1967 boundaries

[vlad321]

badgenome said:

vlad321 said:

Arms contracts in the middle of a revolt from a neutral party, that even some of the jewish commanders agreed saved Israel. But hey, I guess that's fine by you, just liek it must have been fine by you when the CIA funded a whole bunch of other revolts all over the place in the past. I look down on any conflict in which neutral partes involve themselves in, I guess you don't.

The demolishing part pertained solely to the white vs native conflict, not towards this particular one.

So after the Muslims sell land to the Jews, the British forbade the Jews to own weapons or form militias but proved unable to provide security in Palestine, then sold weapons to Israel's future opponents like Transjordan, the Jews didn't win fair and square because they secured a few weapons contracts before they were invaded by no less than 7 countries?

This whole discussion has clearly been a waste of time, as I am now firmly convinced that you haven't any idea at all what happened.

I had no idea that the whole arabic league was the one that fought against Israel at the time? News to me, but thanks for letting me know what I don't know.

This isn't about fairness or not, this is about the involvement of neutral countries in a conflict that doesn't concern them, I would venture to say that Jordan and Egypt were far more impacted by the existance of Israel than Czechoslovakia. If anything the jews were the idiots who decided to start a revolt in the middle of a muslim dominated region. They should have found a way to win it themselves. I already mentioned that if Israel had won the war with their own resources I wouldn't be disagreeing with its existance.

As I said, there have been plenty of cultures who have died out before, and there is nothign wrong with that. Even then I somehow doubt that judaism would have disappeared if there wasn't an official jewish state. It's a fairly tight knit and resilient culture.