By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vlad321 said:

Arms contracts in the middle of a revolt from a neutral party, that even some of the jewish commanders agreed saved Israel. But hey, I guess that's fine by you, just liek it must have been fine by you when the CIA funded a whole bunch of other revolts all over the place in the past. I look down on any conflict in which neutral partes involve themselves in, I guess you don't.

The demolishing part pertained solely to the white vs native conflict, not towards this particular one.

So after the Muslims sell land to the Jews, the British forbade the Jews to own weapons or form militias but proved unable to provide security in Palestine, then sold weapons to Israel's future opponents like Transjordan, the Jews didn't win fair and square because they secured a few weapons contracts before they were invaded by no less than 7 countries?

This whole discussion has clearly been a waste of time, as I am now firmly convinced that you haven't any idea at all what happened.