| vlad321 said: I am not only suggesting that people who fought and lost and were subsequently driven out of their lands lost claim to it, I am outright stating it. It is foolish to say that people who were driven out of their lands by force retain claim to their lands, because geographically the world should look far different than it does now by that logic. The ones that were driven away had a simple choice, do I keep my culture and leave or collaborate and keep my land. If the jews had collaborated like the others had, then they would be living in what we call Palestine anyhow and would have done so for a while. |
So what you are saying is that possession is ten tenths of the law, unless it's the Israelis who are in possession of something. Your arguments continue to be very arbitrary and sound to me more like a conclusion in search of evidence instead of vice versa. "It is okay for an empire to come in an conquer a land. It is not okay to trickle back in over the centuries and eventually conquer the land. I, vlad321, have spoken."
