By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Torillian on 08 May 2011
Edit Thread
Viper1 said:
Torillian said:
Viper1 said:

Torillian, I said, "though our reviewer did score it higher than I did for the first game."

I also think the issue is while the game itself is average, that doesn't mean it sucks or is garbage as is claimed by many reviewers and even a few members.  Just take a look at Joystiq's review for an extreme example.

Joystiq's review seems overly harsh, but they didn't review the first game so you can't use that as a difference between how the first and second games are being treated by reviewers.  By the sound of it the guy probably would have hated the first Conduit as well, just the wrong choice for the review.

http://www.joystiq.com/2009/06/30/review-the-conduit/

They did review it.  3/5 stars.  Different reviwer though.

got me there, weird that that doesn't show up on meta, since they didn't have a review for conduit counted on meta I assumed they didn't do one.



...