Acevil said:
You might hate this even more, but I think the problem with this whole site is the focus on sales vs a better measurement system like ROI. Also the king of consoles based on games, is subjective (as in I think, the wii library is better, or I think the ps3 library is better), thus anyone can say anything, but if you are going to use a bases such as metacritic, or gamerankings.....then you know the console that wins is the 360, which I strongly disagree with. |
That is a really good point but unfortunately such things seem to be overlooked by many.
This is obvious when people keep going on about price cuts. "MS can cut the price" or "Sony should cut the price" are terms often used here just to get their console of choice to finish ahead the other, totally disregarding ROI.
Ultimately the more consoles you sell means the more successful you are, which is different from say the cellphone market where the more money you make (regardless of your market share), the more succesful you are.
So Apple can have less than 5% market share but still make almost 20% of all profits in the industry making it a success.
On the other hand in the console business, the xbox sold more than the gamecube so was therefore "more successful" and "it finished second", even though the xbox lost $bns and gamecube made money.
It's just the way this industry is viewed. It's not going to change soon.







