radishhead said:
He suggested a few, after he realised that singling out me was a mistake. |
It wasn't a mistake I listed other people who have been weak this game but only you as who I thought the weakest player was.
|
radishhead on 02/12/11 12:26 PST
1. Not only this, but he admitted that he didn't have any grounds to be suspicious of me, 2. and merely made misguided remarks about the last game, 3. which Linkz was quick to put right. 4. Nobody could have saw that coming last game - that's why nen was given the MVP, for pulling it off so well. In my opinion, the way that you've managed to divert suspicion off yourself by targeting another player that has had their name mentioned a few times seems considerably more suspicious. Maybe you should have done the research, and actually realised that there was nothing going on there at all. Vote: A Bad Clown |
1. It was ever about you being suspicious of you
2. My remarks were not misguided.
3. He cleared you for mistakes at endgame not the other things. Although he did minize them he didn't clear you of them.
4. Many people could have see it coming. You hammering without even knowing it made it that people had less time to talk so it didn't help.
|
radishhead on 02/12/11 12:36 PST
|
1. This post wasn't needed and in fact looks a bit bad.
|
radishhead on 02/12/11 12:59 PST
1. Might that be because I was having to answer Wonk's questions? I've had to deal with problems this game too :s 2. Why do you keep linking yourself with prof anyway? I thought that the interrogation would have sorted that out 3. That's definitely unfair, since that conversation never ended. It's an ongoing thing - you'll find that people comment on your day 1 actions thoughout the entire game, and maybe even into future rounds. 4. There's a lot of situational things going on in this case too - I wouldn't have to do any of those things. Firstly, prof didn't question me first - Wonk did. Also, I'm not trying to appeal to Prof by putting a vote on you- I mentioned in my voting post that my vote was 100% because of the discussion that we had. Just me and you - prof isn't involved. |
1. technically it wasn't really my questions you were responding to be my plan that could lead to you being lynched
2. not sure what you mean by the second part
3. Very very true.
4.Some decenty points to a pretty crazy acusation. Not the best or the clearest but decent. In fact I'll have to make comment on ABCs comment after this post.
|
radishhead on 02/13/11 11:14 PST
|
1. No STOP DON'T
2. No the main perpose of my plan not argument. Was to have the lynch of you be a viable option for the town over a no lynch.
3. I know you and trying but that doesn't ouright make it so
4. You are right that the issue is at rest. However it is not over.
|
radishhead on 02/13/11 11:48 PST Please, turn off robot mode- it's not helping you to be understood, and it's just rage-worthy >:( 1. As you mentioned, that argument was just between me and Wonk, and it didn't matter that you were gone, because you weren't involved. It was just a coincidence that the argument concluded fairly soon after you left. There was just nothing more to say on the subject. 2. You admitted yourself that you didn't understand the back-story behind the argument - and that's one of the main reasons why it ended so abrubtly. 3. He was complaining that I didn't do much to help the town last game after I was confirmed to be a town member (which was true). 4. We both realised that we had become equals in terms of playstyle, 5. and it was quite a funny realisation (hence the "keep it up", "you too"). |
1 it wasn't just between us Radish in fact is more been between me and other members of the town who don't like my idea.
2. It ended because other people didn't like the idea and I wasn't didn't want to have to go that much into the last games to show you how you messed up more than the endgame.
3. I'm glad you do see that now. That was part of why I think of you as a weaker player.
4. I don't think I'm equal to your playstyle radish. You have your moments and get lucky but I do think you are a weak player. I do think I'm a bit better but then again others might disagree.
5. The keep it up was was hoping that you would keep up trying to do better . Not saying I think you are equal.
So as a whole looking over the posts since the smilely I think you are doing better not great but better. Pointed out a few things in these posts. Tried to clariy a few things. As a whole frow reading back over I'm still neutral on you.
Big thing though I really am wanting to look more into Heph and I'd say ABC has taken your place as the person I would lynch over a no lynch if nothin else is found.
