VGC Mafia Round 25

[theRepublic]

theprof00 said:

A Bad Clown said:

Wonktonodi said:

A Bad Clown said:

I might have to vote against nonome after the day one accusation, unlesss heph is still playing. I'm confused who's voting for who so far, it shows Stef voting twice

bad clown take a look if someoen else explains is sooner or beter my apologies.

Current votes (6 needed to lynch):

[0, L-6] Linkzmax:  (theprof00), (Stefl1504)

[0, L-6] Stefl1504:  (noname2200)

[1, L-5] noname2200: theprof00

[1, L-5] theprof00: Stefl1504

[0, L-6] trashleg: (Hephaestos)

[1, L-5] A Bad Clown: noname2200

 

the number on the far left is the number of current votes.  when a persons name is in brakets that means he(or she) voted for that person but is no longer voting for that person.

Ok, I'll wait for the prof to check him out to see if he could be bad news

Hmmm. This is a relatively serious post.

You're targeting two good players, one simply for voting for you, ne?

YET, you wait for ME to check them out? Why, may I ask, would you be waiting for me to check? During what point in this day have I been painted as the "checker"? 
Are you waiting because I've voted for noname, and you think I have insight into him? 
Why do you think I'd have some special insight?

Have you been following mafia, and remember me as "that guy that interrogates people"?  

This is yet another post that caused a bit of controversy.  The first time I read it, I read it as A Bad Clown wanting to wait for Prof, so that A Bad Clown could make a decision on if A BAd Clown felt Prof was "bad news".

Prof interpreted as A Bad Clown waiting for Prof to give his opinion on other players.  I felt it was a very strong reaction.  If felt odd to me, like it was too strong.  But then A Bad Clown let the whole miscommunication last for about another 200(plus) posts after that, so I'm not sure.