By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pizzahut451 on 07 February 2011
Edit Thread
irstupid said:
pizzahut451 said:
irstupid said:
pizzahut451 said:


Virtual boy is irrelevant. The fact is, 3DS was used by Sony way before 3DS, so implying that Sony planned using  and copying 3D because of 3DS's ''succses'' is ridicilous. Sony had it before §DS, so even if they do come out with portable 3D (which is highly unlikely) they wont be copying anyone.

what are you talking about?  how is virtual boy irrelevant.  It used 3D, that is the point.  End point.  You can't ignore the past. It has nothing to do with Sony or 3DS today.

I am also not saying that sony is copying nintendo's 3ds.  they have no 3D handhelf.  All i'm saying is that sony was not the first company to make 3d video games.  You were stating they were, i was pointing out that, that is indeed false.WHAT? Hell no, i was saying that Sony was using 3D before 3DS, not that they were the first to use 3D in thier games EVER. So if they come out with 3D handheld, they wont be ''eating crow'' or copy anyoe, since they already did use 3D.Nintendo, and others i'm sure had 3d games before sony did.  I wasn't saying sony is copying anybody in 3d, just stating that they did NOT do it first.Then we found our misconception here.

Was avatar the first 3D movie? or spy kids or whatever.  hell no, there have been 3D movies since 1953 at least when hollywood released first big budget one in theatres.  obviously there was also messing aroudn and other 3D movies before that too.  was avatar copying this 1953 movie?  no, but just as above i'm stating james cameron didn't do it first.



how does virtual boy have nothing to do with either? Because its a failed system more than 10 years old. it uses 3D, that is the whole argument.Actually, it isn't, thats what i've ben trying to tell you. I wasnt mentioning virtual boy. I was saying that even if Sony would made a handheld with 3D it wouldnt be copying 3DS (again, THREE-D-S, not fucking virtual boy) You were saying that sony woudl not be copying nintendo's 3D because they already are doing it.  I was stating that Nintendo did 3D first.You honestly think Nintendo was the first one to do 3D in video games, Wow, ok...   The virtual boy was before the PS3's 3D, before the 3DS 3D. And yet i wasnt talking about virtual boy, but 3DS. You can't ignore it.  Doesn't matter if the Virtual boy is this gen hardware or not.  Or are we going to say the 360 was the first system to implement an analog stick.  i mean we can ignore all prior generations right?


your being an idiot.  This has nothign to do with who came out iwth 3D first, which WAS NOT SONY fyi.Neither was Nintendo, FYI

IF Sony says "3D on an handheld is stupid," They didnt say its stupid, they say they find it un-necessary at the moment, don try to twist someone's word to make something out of your argument here.but then later makes the NGP have 3D, that is eating crow.

Who came out with 3D first or that Sony was using 3D before means jack shit in this argument. Than why come up and say '' Sony saying they have been using ths technology 15 years ago'' ? You said that, you brought that up, not me.

Its just like when Sony said MOTION was stupid regarding the Wii, and later release the MOVE.  Doesn't matter if they were working on MOVE in 1910, they STILL ATE CROW. But they did work on the technology before Nintendo (if we pretend they started working on Move in 1910) and that was my whole point from the beginning -  That Sony wouldnt copy 3DS if they used 3D.

How do you not get what eating crow is about.  Its saying one thing and doing another.  Regardless of who invented or used 3D first.  Sony is saying that it is dumb for a handheld.  THUS if they implement it on the NGP, they are serving themselves crow.  Doesn't matter if they are working on 3D for the NGP behind scenes, doesn't matter if PS3 is using 3D.  None of that matters.  It only matter on what they say and what they do.Again, they didnt said its stupid, stop twisiting words.