By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake said:
Porcupine_I said:
sapphi_snake said:
Porcupine_I said:

hold the moral sledgehammer.

i never defended anything they did, i simply question your standpoint in this case.

you are the one asking for the death of people. but you are not ready to kill them yourself, because you are scared of the consequences.

what does that make you in the end?

A coward? But the reason I wouldn't want to kill them does not have anything do to woth my fear of "consiquences". I'm just not cold blooded enough to be a good executioner. There are people better suited for that.

 

Now what does your desire to let child killers on the streets make you?

and that desire do i express in which of my posts exactly?

Don't be childish now. you have actually thought about what you asked in your OP, that is a good thing! There is no need to revert to juvenile argumentations because you didn't like what you came up with.

I'm curious, how do you think this whole situation should've been handled?

i am not going to comment on a case that i have only a wikipedia article and links to newspaper articles as sources. because, unless i have personally spoken to people from all sides involved i can not claim to have a fair opinion.

but i can tell you i am all for keeping dangerous individuals out of society.

i can also understand that you are upset about that they are freed and protected. and i am not saying it is right that they are, but neither do i think it is right to rile up other people to kill them.

 



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’