IGN:- PS3 vs Xbox 360 Year in Review 2010

[homer]

AussieGecko said:

homer said:

I guess what you are trying to say is that games not made exclusively for the move should not be counted? If you do this, the kinect has the better library atm imo, but if you compare any compatible game, move clearly wins, so it all depends on what you are comparing.

Also, are you saying that Halo and ME would be rated lower if they used the kinect? Are you implying that the kinect is unable to produce high quality games? That is a pretty bold statement isn't it?(just messing with you lol, although I am curious about what you meant in that 2nd paragraph)

i meant that some of the move titles seem to be move just tact on, microsoft could have re-released halo and mass effect (high reviewing exlcusives) and put kinect on them and you would have to count them as kinect games, thus why i think that move only games should  be the only move games counted

Mass Effect is no  longer an exclusive series(if you are referring to the first one, isn't that on the pc too?) Also, I wonder how they would accomplish an fps on the kinect, without using a motion/ traditional controller. If you mean that add a little mini game(like done in Harry Potter), I wouldn't consider that  a "kinect game." This is somewhat similar to the whole pc/360 exclusives debate.
Edit:  http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=123089&page=5

 Still some problems to be ironed out, but it appears it may be capable of playing fpses.