mrstickball said:
1. Afghanistan was indeed harboring some elements of Al-Quedia. However, did we have to occupy every square inch of the country to kill a few terrorists? When we invaded, we fought the Taliban more than Al-Quedia. We've been at war with the Taliban for ~8 years now in Afghanistan, not Al-Quedia. There would of been many easier ways to of dealt with Al-Quedia than a boots-on-the-ground invasion. I don't disagree that Saddam was a horrible person that needed to be removed, but was it worth hundreds of billions of dollars? Did Saddam have WMDs? Absolutely. That doesn't mean we should of spent so much to remove what he had (and by that logic, why haven't we attacked Iran or North Korea which have far more advanced programs?) |
I did not think we were completely occupying all of the Kabul region, or close to the border of Pakistan, am I mistaken? What is our problem with the Taliban? Is there a reason we are fighting them? What other solutions were there? I guess human life has a price now? I would gladly spend all the money my country has to save a nation from tyranny and oppression. We should have invaded NK and iran. They constantly harrass us and our allies(Israel and SK) and we should not stand for it. Of course if there were peaceful ways to avoid such a conflict, I would encourage it, but there is no peaceful solution to those problems that I can think of, so it is good that I am no politician lol.
"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." -My good friend Mark Aurelius







