Another day, another person whining that Jim Sterling didn't give a game a perfect score.
The thing about Jim Sterling is that, more than most reviewers, he tries to use the full 1 to 10 range. So when he gives a game a 7.5 out of 10, he is not insulting it. He's saying that it was a good game, and recommends it.
About three quarters of his review was good stuff, and one quarter was the bad. Sounds to me like it was a fair review.







