Looks like GT5's sales performance is making a lot of haters silent..

[Mordred11]

SleepWaking said:

Mordred11 said:

Kasz216 said:

No, it's just completely insubstantial of point.

Avatar wouldn't have made so much,if the director wasn't Cameron.

More people saw Titanic than Avatar,though Avatar made more money.

A BIG part of that people went to see Avatar just because it was ''Cameron's new baby''.

So,like you stated earlier and this thread,people didn't go to see it just for the 3D experience,but rather expected a new masterpiece from Mr. James Cameron.

I haven't read anything else from this conversation, but I know I severely disagree with the point being made here. I would say (alot) more people went to a theatre showing because they wanted to experience 3D with this new revolutionary technique. Every time I was in a discussion with somebody about it or read forums about the movie, most they talked about was the 3D and how it would look like or after you saw it what you thought of it. Cameron was mentioned and the story was mentioned as well but neither one of them was the main attraction of this movie.

That's because most of the people who went to see Avatar are casuals,they don't go on forums and discuss about it.

My point is,a big part of Titanic's audience also went to see Avatar.