pizzahut451 said:
Look, all im saying that women shouldnt be forced to go in the army for the same reasons children shouldnt be forced. An averige woman isnt build for military, nor does she have much knowledge on it. You wouldnt hire a man to be on front page of Playboy magazine for a same reason you shouldnt force women to serve the army. |
The only people who are proud of our country, vote BNP - which is to say, they're bigoted morons. And even anyone who is proud of certain British leaders (including myself) like Margaret Thatcher, Winston Churchill, Clement Attlee, Henry VIII, Elizabeth I and Victoria, acknowledges that it's been a while since we had anyone that good, and it's unlikely that we'll see anyone that good for quite a while. It's certainly not David "Look how progressive I am" Cameron, Nick "Screw my voters, I have coalition" Clegg or Ed "I swear I'm not a Communist!" Miliband. Maybe Nigel Farage, but he'll never be elected, because he leads a "minor party".
/rant
Firstly, there are magazines with near-naked men on the front cover, so your analogy falls flat.
Secondly, what is difficult about holding a gun and firing it? Yes, they can be heavy. But isn't that a problem for weaker men, and not a problem for stronger women? I'm sure the women serving in the armed forces are much stronger physically than I am. Again, I don't think anybody should be drafted. I just think that if there had to be a draft, it should include all adults.
Why not children? Because children are innocent, and their minds are developing. They don't need to see that kind of thing, or be taught that killing is the right way to solve all of your problems. Also, children actually are too weak to use a gun. Adult women aren't.







