| Mr Puggsly said: Its pretty clear your last post was biased. This one is still a little obnoxious, but considerably more reasonable. I'm pretty confident MS will improve the service, you're skeptical. We can keep going in circles but lets just move. |
Bias against a service that's heavily criticised, needs significant improvement and has needed significant improvement for quite a few years from a company that has continually announced they will be improving the service but have constantly failed to do so? Why yes then, I am bias (and skeptical), and for good reason (which have been outlined in this thread by myself and others).
And my posts were obnoxious how? How exactly was it obnoxious considering I was making valid criticisms which you seemingly ignore. Obnoxious would be me calling the service shit with no reasonable criticisms. You disagreeing with my criticisms does not make my post obnoxious. If anything, you not arguing my points appropriately and just classing my posts as obnoxious is far more objecionable than any of the content in my posts.
