OUTCH ! GT5 first french review : 14/20 !!!!!

[Barozi]

CGI-Quality said:

Mirson said:

darthdevidem01 said:

I'll add the nail to this long due coffin called jeux.com's GT5 review:

JEUXVIDEO.COM reviews: 

*GT5 prologue 
Graphics 19/20 
Gameplay 16/20 
Durability 12/20 
Sound 15/20 
Overall 15/20 

*GT5 
Graphics 15/20 
Gameplay 14/20 
Durability 17/20 
Sound 15/20 
Overall 14/20 

IT MAKES NO SENSE THAT GT5 looses 4 points in graphics and 2 points in gameplay from prologue!!!

Different times, different standards. That's all there is to it.

Also, this thread rocks.

You're missing the point. It's voted lower on visuals than a game it's clearly above. Gameplay I can't speak on, but I'm willing to bet that's improved as well. Different times and different standards were also put on Halo: Reach vs Halo 3, but most would be crazy to consider Halo 3's visuals a step above Halo: Reach's.

What I learned today is that the standard cars (of which there are 800) are looking inferior to the ~200 premium cars. Also some tracks are looking really weak.

Now I have GT5 Prologue and even though there were only a few tracks, all of them looked good. If I'd see other tracks or cars in GT5 that look not nearly half as good I'd definitely give it a lower score.

Furthermore 2008 isn't 2010 thus I'm also agreeing that giving a lower score (even if it's only one point) solely based on the time it has been released is a fair reason.