| Kasz216 said: I would disagree that there isn't any point in arugeing with someone who won't change their mind. I know that many times I've seen arguements between two people and it's changed my mind simply because one side had a large amount of logic and numbers and facts while the other side had almost none. In between two argueing forces, I like to think there are a number more of reasonable people who's minds may be changed by the facts. Of cousrse, once you hit 10 pages then it's probably time to take a step back or if the person goes into stupid generalizations racism or nationlism or something, but still... not argueing with unreasonable people simply makes unreasonable arguements sound reasonable. |
True, but it's somewhat in the eye of the beholder for me. For me, someone who won't change their mind is really, really far out, and thankfully they are a rarity. So while your point stands for these people as well, I don't think we agreed on when a person won't change be changing their minds.
