Solid_Snake4RD said:
|
Man do you have to reply within my quotations? It gets so confusing this way.
1- I read the shipment difference was 8.5 million at peak. Still it's sold that matters, Initially there was a 5 million gap, Peak 360 gap was 8.1 million, currently 3.9 million, and I didn't check after the adjustment, but I bet before the 360 Slim launch it was even lower (3.5 maybe?).
2- Dunno what your talking about, I quoted you and Squilliam, I'm allowed to respond to both people. Think your just trying to give me a bad reputation, even though I didn't do anthing wrong here.
3- Dunno about that one, even my parents knew Gamecube was Nintendo. and Nintendo 64, not Nintendo enough..
Funny you mention the delay in the N64 and the lack of third party support as your reason why the N64 failed, didn't the Wii do the exact same thing and become successful?
Also Playstation Brand-name is not really that much more established then Microsoft gameingwise. I mean in Americas region, 360 outsells PS3 5:3, and in EMEAA they are almost even. It's been 4 years since PS3 launched, if Brand name were that big I'm sure the 360 wouldn't have kept pace for so long.
4- All you did was insult my comment, but didn't provide a counter arguement.
Also I don't think the arcade will go down to $100, but $130. The difference in price is the hard drive, and just like the cost of the 360, the cost of the hard drive goes down too. It's not necessarily in increments of $100.
5- I made mistakes by choice? huh? That wouldn't be a mistake anymore.
Okay seriously, stop with the hate, I know our past debates lead to you being banned on these forums, but please debate. Don't return every comment I had with essenially "lies""your bad" or "bias." I want to have a proper debate..
BTW MS buying Kinects was a joke, but if they can afford 3M Kinects with their marketing budget, they must expect the peripheral to sell moderatly well.
6- So PS3 sales jumping from 150k weekly sales (which it held for months) to 240k weekly sales from Sept 11th to Oct 2nd was for what reason? Unlike Halo which spiked sales for 1 or two weeks, Move holds it up. Console bundles are not limited, and it appeals to a broad audience.
Two weeks ago I didn't think Move would budge PS3 sales, and I was wrong, just like VGChartz was before the adjustment.
No look at Nintendo's press conference, they have charts showing PS3 sales jumped during Move, I thought that too, that the Move bump as too high, but it wasn't really. Before Move, 360 was outselling the PS3.
I don't understand that underlined bit, people thought Kinect was a man toy? First of all, whats a man toy, and if your refering to the hardcore audience, exactly what is it about Dance Central and Kinect Adventures that appeals to the hardcore audience??
Kinect is not an all in one package? huh? It's 1 camera, there is no second peice. Move is not an all in one package, and purchase options can be confusing for that.
Also Move is expensive too. Both charge a $100 extra when bundled with a console, the only difference is standalone Kinect costs $150. However the PS3 Move bundles only account for 1 move controller, no navigation controller ($30 extra), and if you play with friends, a second controller is $40? (right?), plus a second navigation controller ($30). So both peripherals are expensive, but Move seems to be pushing a lot of consoles, I don't see why Kinect won't.
What problems about Kinect are you refering to? and since kinect appeals to a casual audience, I don't think it's appeal will be limited to the 2 month period before christmas 2010. It's going to be pushing consoles all year round.
As for your opinion on Wii, thats your opinion. I know a lot of people who bought a Wii day 1 and still love it. Hardcore gamers might get bored of it, but the vast majority of the Wii audience is not a hardcore gamer. So who knows what they are thinking. I bet a lot of fitness nuts who bought a Wii Fit look at Kinect as a much more efficient exercise machine.
7- What are you talking about? What exactly have I done that's not respective of you? Your accusing me of choosing my mistakes, twisting the truth around, and trying to make people enter a debate? Squilliam was the person I quoted! How could I try to force him into a debate? He was the one in it first, and I was just backing him up.
What advice do you have for me? Look I don't unsult you, or acuse you of things, I keep to the topic at hand, and all I ask in return is you do the same. I do not want a repeat of your behaviour last time.
I have no clue what your talking about in the underlined part at the end. Who told me to keep out of threads, and bringing what up again and again. Sorry I don't mean to insult you here, but you really should proof read or something before you post. Just going to underline what I don't understand.
I do listen, I debate. I don't take others opinions without supporting evidence and accept it as a garenteed situation. PS3 sales have risen because of Move, I listened to your VGChartz numbers are off point, and I replied thats not quite true if you ever see some graphs from Nintendo's Press Conference (which shows PS3 sales jump after the launch of Move). Just because I don't agree, and respond with a counter arguement, doesn't mean I don't listen.
I write a wall of text because I don't think you ever understand my reasoning. I don't think you understand because you usually don't come back with a counter arguement, usually you just brush off what I have to say and make a new point. Also a lot of good debaters (like CGI off the top of my head), write long comments too, thats not a bad thing, it just means we have put thought into the subject. I also write complete sentances, and reply to every point made, I don't pick and choose, so it takes up a lot of space.
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database 
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results













