Calmador said:
Barozi said:
Calmador said:
Barozi said:
I fully support the idea of the online pass. I even think $10 is too low, but at least a good start.
And people who say the game aren't worth to be played and therefore are being sold to others, just read more reviews if you're unsure, play the demo or play it at a friends house BEFORE you make the decision to buy it.
It's not the developers fault that you fell for buying a game that you don't like, it's YOUR own fault. And everyone who is defending their own mistakes by blaming others (devs) just cannot admit that they were wrong from the start and try make themselves feel better by doing that.
Gamers who don't support this are simply selfish. Bitching about paying $5 more for a new game and supporting the industry. We are all gamers. We should unite, so that we are guaranteed to get games in the futures, but the ones who only buy used are the ones who put the knife in our back.
Also consider the following, because I'm sure that many of these people are also the ones who think that gaming is too expensive. It's total BULLSHIT. Gaming is as "expensive" as always and furthermore it's even the cheapest form of digital entertainment. You're getting more for your bucks than going to cinema, buying DVD/Blu-Rays and buying music. We are very lucky that the prices are how they are, because many of them should (not that I hope they would) actually be much higher.
|
Reading reviews... playing the demo... even playing it at a friends house.. it doesn't matter... people will still turn around think a game is not for them.
People that pre-order? Have you considered them? They do read reviews and previews but that'll never be enough... not even a demo is enough sometimes... the moment of truth is when the gamer plays the game in full. It's not selfish... it's just something natural that happens... people buy something thinking they'll like it but sometimes they don't and put it in the used market! So yes to those people it IS the developers fault... they were not satisfied[period]
The ones who buy used... as a explained before purify the industry... did you even read my original post?
|
You simply need to be stupid if you pre-order a game which you don't know if you'll like it or not.
Again extremely poor excuse to blame others for own mistakes. Even better learn from these mistakes and don't make them over and over again.
|
No... you simply have to not like the full game that you pre-order based on reviews... previews that show 1/100 of a game. Sure you get some coverage but IT DOESN'T ALWAYS WORK. That little coverage will NEVER be enough to ensure a gamer he/she is getting a game he/she wants to keep. Wow.. how dense do you have to be to not understand that.
Amazing... you don't even deserve a say based on how little you understand.
|
ah a good sign for me. People are always getting agressive when they don't have anymore good reasons.
You're losing this conversation :)
As for my reply just read what I posted earlier or read KylieDog's post.
The possibilities of judging a game without buying it are endless.
The problem is that you simply don't know what you like, which is again not even close the fault of the developer.
@Mr Khan
There are publisher who use dedicated servers on consoles and even if not, why are people paying $15 each month for MMORPGs, but not for shooters ?
Even though they also account for certain expenses and keep you from buying new games, simply because you don't need them cause you're still playing the same old MW2 (or Halo Reach) every day for months.