Zlejedi said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Zlejedi said:
Carl2291 said:
Squilliam said:
Fail on those calling fail...
Seriously people, grow up.
If you call fail, you are fail and that is all there is to it. Mark Rein has a hell of a lot more credibility than any of you.
|
This comment has been ignored for some strange reason.
I think I will quote you, just incase people miss it the first time
|
Reasons aren't strange.
People are still in denial that Nintendo did it again. And will be releasing machine that isn't even near current standards while charging hefty price tag on it. And what worse they will be selling this machine for next 6-7 years.
Sadly the more i learn about 3DS the less i want it.
|
Nintendo did it again? Not inflating their specs is treated like a bad thing?
Plus so many other developers have gushed about the system being something they have been asking for from Nintendo, and this is supposed to not be near current standards?
Plus are you forgetting that handheld standards right now are only from a machine costing even more than the 3DS will?
|
Yes when those specs will make everything on your platform look bad in 2 years time after release and very bad after 5-6 years then not giving up to date cpu, gpu and ram is bad.
If IGN is right they are somewhere at level of 200 euro smartphone but in two-three years time those 200 euro smartphones will have specs of current top of line phones like iphone 4 and Galaxy S while Nintendo will be selling same 3DS. And in 6 years time 3DS will compare to top of line smartphone like current DS to Galaxy S.
|
so just like the xbox 360 then or any other reasonably priced launch console...
they are not SONY they are not going to invest ~$1b to develop a CPU so they can have technical superiority. And everything in computing gets outdated, usually within a year. So what's your point, the 3DS is fine, not top of the line but as good as you can expect for the price (using the expected $250 US price) all features considered.
@TheVoxelman on twitter
