| Safiir said: I thought all that was important about a console is how many games it has that you want to play. So far wii has...2 games that I'm interested in. Zelda and Fire emblem. Not a very good reason to buy a console because of two games :/ On the other hand ps3 has 13 - resistance, tekken, vf5, double agent, ridge racer 7, motorstorm, armored core 4, tony hawk's project 8, enchanted arms, genji 2, full auto 2, gundam crossfire and gundam musou. So its 13 against 2...it's not even a competion :/ Same with the ds and psp. I could care less if wii sells 100 times the amount of ps3. If it only has games for casual gamers...it's just something I don't need. So I really don't understand why are all the nintendo fanboys so fixated on the sales of either platform? And don't give me that bs about how the developers will make games for the platform with the biggest userbase. If that were true the pc games developers would still make games for the 486. |
I agree with this statement to a certain extent (PS2 with DVD playback capability notwithstanding).
That is your opinion. Others may have different criteria as to what they want to play. You see two Wii games you'd like to play and 13 PS3 games you'd like to play. I'm quite sure that there are others out there who may say the opposite.
This is a console sales-oriented site - you have to expect people to be somewhat fixated on sales volumes, right?
Again, that's your opinion. I don't think anyone on this, or any other site, has been able to provide an all-encompassing definition as to what constitutes casual and hardcore gaming, so this point is moot IMO.
Nobody is giving you any BS, even though it seems like the trend. And for your information, there are games designed for the lowest common denominator - not necessarily 486 cpus, but flash-type/java mini games found on your typical portals that happen to attract droves of gamers ("casual" and "hardcore"), and can be run on virtually any computer still operating under our sun.
BTW, welcome! 
