scottie said:
Investors go to the strong company, not the nice one. Kotick presents his company as being ahead of all the other video game companies, and shows the company's plan for the future. Investors will lap it up.
Insulting any future partners matters not, because all the heads of video game companies understand that he is just slinging mud to improve his company's position. Sure, the 1% of companies who decide who to work with based on who they agree with morally will avoid Activision because of this (they already would have so even that is no loss) but the 99% who go where the money is will just see this as a strong advertising campaign, and will be more likely to join Activision, in order to get such marketing behind them, as opposed to against them.
And pissing off players is also not an issue. Almost all gamers who frequent forums/video game news sites already hate Activision with a passion, and yet still buy their products. I certainly hate Activision (not for their marketing) and yet still play Wow, I'll buy Starcraft II when all 3 campaigns can be purchased for a decent price. |
As always, but it still pisses me off how almost no one in the industry gives a crap about how this business is run. I doubt Bobby will be told to tone it down by the powers that be, but damn would I like to see it...







