Why does Sony fail at making another mega franchise?

[Michael-5]

CGI-Quality said:

Michael-5 said:

I debate a one-track lookout? Have you said one negative comment on PS3 at all in this debate? Every console has it's pros and cons, and all I hear from you is Pro-PS3. I'm giving both positive and negative comments for the PS3, and it's seems every single negative I say you flip out on me for, and start being rude, but when I say something positive, you just give a short congrats. Seriously, PS3 is a good console, but it's 3rd for a reason. The PS3 had a terrible start, It lacked games (unlike PS2), it was really expensive, Blu-Ray wasn't the accepted form of media, it had stronger competition then ever before, and despite being the most graphically powerful console, Gears of War 1 looked better then any PS3 game at the time, and multiconsoles games looked better on the 360.

And yes I think Heavenly Sword was underdeveloped. Either that or it was just a terrible game, which do you prefer me to say?

This literally is my last post to you -

The problem is this - you stray off-topic, turn your opinions (or inaccuracies) into self proclaimed facts, and don't know how to accept being corrected. Nobody has "flipped out" on you, been rude, or whatever. You just have a problem with being corrected.

The PS3's start is irrelevant to the topic. It's 2008 line-up are irrelevant to this topic. The question is "why does Sony fail a making another mega franchise"? Where's their "mega franchise" from the PS2 era? There isn't one, which is what I've been saying all along, they don't need another one. You just went into stuff that meant nothing to why they don't have another mega franchise, which in and of itself shows a bias. It's not about pro-PS3, it's about the main question, which we've just given mainly opinions back and fourth on, and you've needed to be corrected in some of your inaccuracies.

I'm sure you'll quote me again, but I won't respond.

I mention factors to why PS3 doesn't have some "mega" franchises and you and gekkoman go an a rampage trying to insult me because I said one little negative comment about the PS3. Then we go off topic because I have to defend myself from accusations of being a fanboy.

You're not so much rude, but you do say comments that undermine me and make me look like I don't know anything about the market. Sometimes the way you says things is a little rude, but your okay, I don't care about that. Just please don't undermine me if you disagree. I respect your opinions, so respect mine.

"Having a problem being corrected" is an example of undermining me. When someone else stepped in and explained 2nd party I agreed. I had no problem there. You haven't so much corrected me but claimed that "I have holes on my logic" yet never do you explain them. You just tell me I'm wrong because I disagree with you, and that simply does not make me wrong.

From the PS3, Sony had GT3 and GT4 as "mega" franchises, and FF, and GTA were essentially console exclusives, or really really delayed timed exclusives. I've been trying to say that for a while too. I tried to explain this, and you guys ignored me, and I explained some other reasons, and at least gekkoman flipped out on me.

Look there is two sides to a debate, trying to blaime me as the sole perpitrator to this debate is just another way of how your trying to undermine me. All I want to do is debate logic and reasoning. I've been doing fine with everyone else here. With you it seems I can't say anything negative about Sony, because Sony has never made any mistakes with the PS3, and it's sales are low for unknown reasons.

It's good that you won't respond to this. You telling me that I get off topic and this entire message is you telling me off. Your trying to undermine me, and I'm doing my best to be civil. Thats not fair.