I have got to ask, but why do some of you feel that SONY is relying to much on 3rd party support? if anything they are the ONLY ones relying on 1st party support other than Nintendo. And Nintendo is relying on what it always has Mario, Zelda and Metroid. That's what works for them. Microsoft is/was relying on Halo/Gears(both 3rd party mnd you) and that's what works for them, more so because from what I have seem the ONLY true HUGE sellers on 360 are shooters which tends to be what Xbox/360 fans prefer(just my opinion of course). Gears and Halo are the ONLY games on 360 that sell HUGE no other games do that. And in my eyes that just shows how thier fanbase is built and it is built on shooters, the controller is MADE for shooters(the feel of it anyway).
What bothers me is why does a game have to sell 10mil units to be considered "succesful" 4-5mil is VERY succesful if you ask me. Sony is creating LOTS of new IPS, even if it is not anything "new" they are building on what's out there and making it better and do not see anything wrong with that at all. As others have said sales do not always equal quality cause I personally feel that Halo 3 was a HUGE let down compared to Halo 1 and 2(m opinion yet again) yet it sold CRAZY well. Just my point of view...
The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...
PSN: StlUzumaki23
